

| Subject: | Does the WBX suck valves? |
| From: | Stuart MacMillan |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Sep 2012 11:46:51 -0700 |
All aircooleds certainly did, but I don't recall seeing anything on this list while I've been checking it (off and on since 1997 or so). Since I've got leaky valves, particularly the exhaust valves which were notorious for snapping off "BWBX" (before the water boxer). Anyone remember the sodium filled exhaust valves in the 2.0 of the early '70s? After thoroughly analyzing and pricing conversions, (min $12,000 by the time you are done with all the worn out ancillary crap, including the transmission) I may be looking to either slap some heads on this one or look for a rebuildable core I can build over the winter. I could also upgrade the other systems piece by piece over time. But, if this engine isn't a valve eater, (just a rod sucker, at least for the 2.1) then I may just drive it, but only within 200 miles! One thought is to just have a spare engine in the garage at all times and forget about the conversion, but I would like to take some extended trips someday and don't want to trailer an extra engine. Stuart '85 Westy
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »