I gotta believe that the average Oakland cop is just trying to get
through an average day without getting shot so this ban will be
mostly un-enforced. SF cops are pretty much the same way---they look
the other way on most of this kind of nonsense.

The biggest danger when a law like this is passed is a bonehead
neighbor who wants to make trouble for you.

Do you happen to know what exactly qualifies as an RV in this
particular bit o' nonsense?

Jeff / San Anselmo
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Automatic digest processor wrote:

> Date:    Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:00:54 -0500
> From:    Geza Polony <gezapolony@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
> Subject: Municipal camper bans
>
> Folks,
>
> Have any of you ever dealt with this kind of a problem? My city,
> Oakland,
> CA, is very seriously considering a ban on camper parking within
> the city
> limits, apparently following the lead of Santa Barbara and other
> places.
> This ban would include Vanagon Campmobiles such as the type owned
> by yours
> truly. Obviously, I'm concerned.
>
> Does anyone have experience with this kind of thing? Can cities of
> this size
> get away with such ordinances, which would prohibit even non-city
> residents
> from parking their RV's, etc., for even a few minutes on city streets?
>
> The first offense is $250; the second, towing. It would apply even
> to a
> Vanagon Weekender without a poptop, as long as it has anything inside
> intended for camping (per Calif. vehicle code.)
>
> If this passes, I can't keep my Westy. Is that unbelievable or what?
>
> If you have any interest in it, read Chip Johnson's article in the
> SF Chronicle.
>
> Geza