

| Subject: | Re: drums and shoes |
| From: | Al and Sue Brase |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:43:43 -0600 |
George: I've lamented the loss of shoe arcing places, too, but perhaps a good fit is not very necessary with the rear brakes. I think they only contribute about 25% to the total braking power. I did many brake jobs years ago on 4 wheel drums and it made a big difference there (I worked in a shop that had a drum lathe/ shoe grinder. I ground a lot of asbestos shoes. That stuff smelled so nice!!) To illustrate how unimportant the rear shoes are: When we got our first 87 Vanagon (with 24k miles) in October of 1990, the first time my wife took it out by herself and returned, I was standing next to it and noticed a strong burning rubber smell. Upon close inspection, I realized the tires were smoking because the brakes were red hot. I'd apparently left the e-brake on (I ALWAYS DO!) and she- not being familiar with the new car- just drove it that way. I immediately sprayed off the wheels with water from a garden hose, to avoid damaging the tires further. I figured the brake shoes would be nearly destroyed. I inspected them later, and they did have many heat cracks in the linings, but no loss of lining chunks. I think I did ultimately replace them after another 100k miles! What this proved to me was two things: 1. The oe linings are pretty good stuff! 2. They are way over engineered for the work they usually do. Al Brase George Goff wrote: >In a message dated 2/5/05 4:56:29 PM, mpteleski@YAHOO.COM writes: > ><< Can i be a cheap-ass and keep the old shoes or do i need to replace them >at the same time? i was concerned that the old shoes will be a different fit on >the new drums. >> > >Matthew, > >The newer shoes might even fit the replacement drums better than the old >drums. It seems to be a vanishing concern to radius shoes to fit drums. I'm not >certain if this is caused by the problems with asbestos dust or if drums have >gotten so cheap that they are routinely changed along with shoes. If you >inspect replacement shoes, once they have been scuffed in, which have not been >radiused, you will find that as little as a third of the friction face is making >contact. At that rate, the shoe will be worn out before it fully seats. > >A few years ago, I went in search of a shop in my burg to radius some shoes >for me. I realized that I was in deep doo-doo whenever City Brake said that >they no longer had the equipment to do the job. City Brake does only brake work >and they have been around since automobile brakes were nothing more than a >leather belt wrapped around a flat pulley. I took it on myself to radius the >shoes by fabricating a radius fixture to use on a 12" stationary disc sander. I >dragged the sander outside to do the work and I still wore a dust mask with >filters rated for asbestos. Although my fixture had no micrometer dials, I >bumped it gradually to a tight fitting radius. The shoes came out pretty damn >good, but, after all of that, it didn't seem to make a difference in the >seat-of-the-pants. > >George > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »