

| Subject: | Re: Bad Tiico's and Good Samaritans (story) |
| From: | Antaki |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:59:36 -0800 |
Hi Ian and all, My 16V Scirocco gained a whole new life when I replaced the 1.8L with a 2.0L. Low end torque to spare, and boogies like mad at the upper ranges. I'd consider this engine for my Syncro Westy - anyone have experience with a 2.0L 16V in a Vanagon? Thanks, Ron -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of ian Butler Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:33 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Bad Tiico's and Good Samaritans (story) On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Eric Zeno wrote: > This is interesting. Someone a while ago said that the Tiico > head was different than the US inline 4 Cyl. Obviously this is true. > All inline US 4 cly. engines except the diesel are non-interference > engines, to the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure about the newer 2.0L block. > Eric Eric, An exception to the non-interference rules are the 1.8L and 2.0L 16v engines, 1986-1992(?) Scirocco and GTI. 10:1 compression on those, too. However, I don't think the 16v was ever a serious consideration for Vanagon engine conversions. Not torquey enough (at least my Scirocco doesn't seem to be) in the lower RPM ranges. ian Butler / ian@bluemoon.hplx.net '88 Scirocco 16v, '87 Syncro GL
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »