

| Subject: | Re: Exhaust Question: Stock, S&S, or Stebro? |
| From: | Andrew Bell |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:06:24 -0600 |
I have a S&S header on my 1987 Syncro, and noticed a huge difference in everything from performance (pick up) to mileage as well as a lower "note". It cost me about $350 installed from Vintage Performance in Minnesota (jjbbhome@ll.net), and I was told the installation was "flawless". I have another Van needing an exhaust in about 2-3 months, and I'll probably get the same S&S, though this time I'll get the ceramic coated version. If Stebro offered a header, I'd REALLY look @ that. The only drawback on the S&S is that is's steel, and in the salt belt, it kind of suck. There you go - AB Jason Denton wrote: >I looked through the archives and found mixed feelings on the header vs stock >exhaust systems. I am replacing the rusty exhuast system on my 90 Westy and a >bit taken back by the cost of replacing all the pipes. > >Has anyone had good or bad experiences with the other options for exhaust >systems....S&S headers, Sebro stainless steel, or stock? I am leaning toward >something that will not rust up here in the North. Thanks very much. > >Merry Christmas. > >Jason D. >90 Westy > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »