

| Subject: | Re: Information |
| From: | Robert Lilley |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jul 2001 22:51:37 EDT |
The 2.1 L crank is not counterbalanced. There are different opinions on whether to counterweight or not. I chose to add counterweights to my stock crank because of the benefits that they add: double the bearing life, smoother revs, more power, stronger crank, better oil control, (www.geneberg.com tech> crankshaft). The only down side is the time it takes for the counterweights to be added. It was only $150 more the counterweights and when divided by the estimated mileage it cost less than a penny a mile, 0.001 cost per mile for 150,000 miles (for 200,000 miles it cost only 0.00075 per mile) (300,000 miles cost only 0.0005 per mile) If it is in your budget, I would add the counterweights. As far as the 1.9 rods Vs the 2.1L rods, if you have the complete 2;1L rods use them. They are matched to the correct length and pin height for the 2.1L pistons and the increased stroke of the 2.1 L crank. If you have one that has a bad journal, IF it is not Blued, burnt or bent, it can be rebuilt and work fine. Demello can rebuild a rod and them match the set to balanced end for end. They might be the same length and be interchangeable, I have not compared the two. Boston Bob would be able to give you more info, but I would suspect that they are different for the different strokes. Robert [text/html]
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »