

| Subject: | Engine conversions; Waterboxer to: |
| From: | Damian Shaw |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:54:24 -0700 |
I don't often chime-in on these discussions, but in this case I feel compelled: Engine: Subby Boxer Pros: Cheap, powerful Cons: Not VW therefore not very compatible - will require the owner be the expert. Many custom pieces needed. Engine: VW I-4 from a N.American car Pros: Cheap, decent power, conversion kit available from FastForward, Most VW mechanics will be able to fix it., Long life. Cons: Usually involves using CIS FI (a step 'backwards' from a full-engine management system), most of these conversion require the engine lid to be modified, still a cobbled-together system. Engine: VW I-4 from S.Africa Pros: Perfect fit, built by VW for the Vanagon, VW Mechanics will know this one too. Lots of power, Very long life. Cons: Cost, some parts may be hard to replace in the future (coolant hoses, etc) Engine: VW I-5 from N.America Pros: Great power, very long life (longer than I-4), VW Mechanics know this one too., In the US these engine are VERY cheap at the wrecking yards. Cons: Hard to get a kit to get the engine in the van, engine lid will probably need modifying too. Very few done. Probably would use CIS-E - this is a 'con' to 'neutral' based on if your van has Digifant or Digijet respectively. The way I see it, if you want to convert, the VW engines are the better choice. If you have a premium Vanagon or Westy and want 'the best' go with TIICO's I-4 from S.Africa. If you have more of a beater Van / Westy or a lower budget get David Marshall's kit and put in an I-4. Either a 1.8 or 2.0. CIS won't be your best friend (don't get me wrong, it's a very good FI system, BUT..) because it's not a full engine mgmt system and won't be as smooth as Digifant. Digijet, however, isn't as sophisticated and the difference will probably be less noticable. I would think Digijet to CIS-E would be a very comparible swap. If you want the best bang for your buck go with a Subby but know that your entire van's maintenance is basically your responsiblity now. You'll need to be a good mechanic too - things like wire connectors, etc, will eventually kill you if you don't do them right. If you're not mechanically enclined fix your waterboxer. I'm not trying to ruffle feathers or anything - every option has its advantages. I've thought on this one for a very long time and it seems quite clear-cut. I think one of the heuristics that cloud this issue is that Vanagon owners, as a group, tend to be more mechanically enclined so the 'average car owner' arguments don't apply as easily. Here's my profile to engine choice recommendations: Cheap, not a purist, extremely mechanically enclined: Subaru engine (5%) Middle-of-the-road on 'purist', cheap, somewhat mechanically enclined (student, or paddler): I-4 conversion (10%) Purist, somewhat mechanically enclined, got a bit more money: I-4 from S.Africa (5%) Everyone else: fix/replace the waterboxer (80%) Fixing the waterboxer is really a very good choice and you can sell the van in the future... Well, don't flame me! Damian
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »