

| Subject: | Re: Diesels in America? |
| From: | ARKADY MIRVIS |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 1999 04:12:55 -0700 |
The problem is in unwillingness of americans or unaffordability to go and see Europe in details. Who visit? Or recent college graduates, or elderly. Both groups aren't interested in what powers vehicles: gas or diesel. Years ago there was another group-draft dodgers. The most famous is Clinton, from whom nothing was ever heard about introducing more VEHICLES with DIESELS. To start. Diesels do not experience lack of air for combustion, the air is abundant! Gasoline engines emit far more poisonous gases than diesel. The specific smell of diesel exhaust comes mostly from aromatics, not very dangerous substances . The smoke everybody sees is the result of poor adjustment and is consists of particulates. There are documented cases of diesel locomotives stuck in tonnels FOR HOURS with no accidents or fatalities. Gasoline engines would kill definitely. Sometimes we hear of suisides in garages. May be because of small number of diesels, I never heard of diesel car involved. My sharp ears hear a lot of diesel cars in Europe. The buses move so quiet that it is easy not to hear and be run over. And no smoke, no smell! The exhaust is astonishingly clean thanks to Eberspaecher ( the vehicle heater manufacturer!) filters, conveters and afterburners installed. In many countries diesel price is half of that of gas, this combine with diesel efficiency attracts the customer. Diesel engines are by far more robust, durable and reliable and can be produced cheap. Is not unusual to meet a diesel vehicle with many hundred thousands of miles! American public must finally awaken to the fact that foreign economies are efficient with less resources and do not start wars to advance interests of oil barons. Ark. Kent Christensen wrote: > For some years before the merger Chrysler has been producing > both minivans and Jeeps in Europe and offering diesels in > them. American diesel lovers need to face the fact that > auto executives here do not believe there is a market for > diesels big enough to justify doing it and they're correct. > As far as bureaucracy goes, I bet it's easier to do diesels > than gasoline engines and don't think that's the problem. > Domestically produced diesels? Given NAFTA, Mexico (where > Golfs and Beetles are made) is domestically! What are you > waiting for again? (Not flaming, just funning!)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »