

| Subject: | Re: torque and HP |
| From: | David Marshall |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Sep 1998 23:18:37 -0700 |
The 16V or even a highly modded 8V is not a good choice, you want the power on low. 8V - 2.1L wasserboxer 90hp@5500 117ft/lb@3200 8V 1.8L 86-88 GTI/GLI 102@5250 110@3250 8V - 2.0L 93-98 G/J/Cab 115hp@5200 135ft/lb@2600 16V 1.8L 86-89 G/J/S 123hp@5800 120ft/lb@4250 16V 2.0L 90+ G/J/P 134hp@5800 133ft/lb@4400 As you can see the 2.0L 8V has more torque than a 2.0L 16V! Toque is where it is at! The 1.8L 8V is more or less the same as a wasserboxer for power... you want power down low especially for a Syncro. This is why Turbo Diesel is so common on the 16" Syncros - TORQUE and down very low as compaired to any gasoline engine. 8V 1.9L TD 75hp@4200 111ft/lb@2400-3400 8V 1.9L TDI 90hp@4000 149ft/lb@1900 The 1.8L on your garage floor would be perfectly suited for a Rabbit or Scirocco where it is light and the gearing lends towards revving it to readline... At 00:21 9/25/98 -0500, Carl Hansen wrote: >David, > >From the H.P figure I would guess you are talking about the 8 valve engine. >Have you got any figures on both of the 16V engines, the 2 liter, and >especially the 1.8 liter?? > >I'm curious because I have a spare 1.8 liter 16V sitting inthe garage, with >nowhere to put it, but maybe into my '89 Syncro. > >Ch >'89 SyncroBeast Vanagon > >'87 16V GTI >'80 850 Yamaha Special > >'87 16V GTI w/ hale damage - parting out >'89 16V GTI w/ toasted motor > >'86 Scirocco (8 valve w/ auto) - SO's > >Prior Lake, MinneSnowta >well, ok, it's summer >Land of Sky Blue Waters > > -- David Marshall Quesnel BC Canada mailto:david@volkswagen.org -- -- 73 Audi 100LS, 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy -- -- 87 Audi 5KQ, 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 2.0L VW Syncro Double Cab -- -- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org --
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »