

| Subject: | RE: 91 Synchro Questions - Reliability of VW engines, etc. |
| From: | Mark Flynn |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 1997 12:31:45 -0400 |
Steve, My observations are based on talking w/an import parts/auto engineer/race track owner/aircraft engine importer friend, and two other mechanics w/experience w/the vanagon wasserboxer. The auto engineer thinks the vanagon engine is like "a science-fair project to convert an aircooled engine to water cooled." He loves the crazy head gaskets, "oh no, couldn't make a flat gasket & gasket surfaces so both head & cylinder can be milled, oh no, of course not". They advise me to get rid of my '87 synchro and laugh that I'm tied to it emotionally. "Machines have no emotions, they're good or not good. Vanagon engines aren't." I have also read in this list that the viscous coupling is WAY expensive to fix/replace. Over time, it has become clear from the vanagon list that the vehicles present a line of painful problems. Bleeding the cooling system? Tilt front end 41" up or whatever, do a one-footed dance chanting "bubbles be gone". This kind of foolishness isn't found on other vehicles. (Well, there was the V-6 Vega where you loosen & lift the engine to replace the rear spark plugs. So they became V-4s after xx,000 miles, w/the original rear plugs looking like sparklers on the 5th of July. or JAGUARS hahahahaha.) Then, in the face of that kind of information is the way we love our vans!!! Recently there was a post that JD Power (the people who poll car buyers) found that vanagon owners were 2d only to some Ford van for owner satisfaction after owning 5 years. (Think that may have been skewed, since Chrysler owners all trade for the newer, swoopy model <3 years out, except those who like warped alum. heads and the nice white smoke trails they make.) You know, I never really liked the Dead, but sure as hell like & liked Hendrix, Cream, CS&N, et als. Connection to VW vans? -- Mark Flynn Winchester, VA
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »