

| Subject: | FRAM specualtion re pressure |
| Date: | Tue, 28 May 1996 08:07:06 -0700 |
Terry Tan wrote: "It is common knowledge among us who are on the list awhile that Fram filters are unsuitable for Vanagons." I offer this speculative response to observations that FRAM oil filters used in Vanagons result in lower oil pressures: Lower particulate threshold passing media combined with lower total media surface area. In particulate passage tests, FRAM has shown up as a top performer for years. This indicates to me that they have elected to use a finer pass media than most competitors. As to whether the cost per unit area of this is higher than coarser media, I don't know that either. But I did find it interesting to see a FLAPS point of sale product demonstration supplied by WIX, who's product box seems to claim WIX is an Original Product Manufacturer for quite a few others marketed labels. The demo consisted of a FRAM and WIX oil filter apparently from identical application specifications. Each was cut around its circumference to allow easy inspection of its media. Just guessing based on what I saw, I'd think the accordion folded media had about twice the unfolded surface area in the WIX compared to the FRAM. There are so many assumptions integrated into this speculation that I offer it only as a first conjectural comment. I could be completely wrong. If someone knows of a person who wouldn't bias their comments to favor a company's economic interests, and who could address this anomaly well, please do a little arm twisting to get their explanation posted as to why the ordinarily considered excellent Fram product apparently performs so poorly in Vanagons. John "Do not look into laser with remaining good eye."
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »