| Subject: | Re: Google AI Superior For Vanagon Questions |
| From: | Ned Savoie <ned@HARBOURLIGHT.COM> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2023 19:02:07 -0500 |
Wow, that's really interesting. Looking forward to it...
Ned
--
Ned Savoie
Creative Director
Harbour Light Strategic Marketing
Savvy Software, Inc.
3 Congress Street
2nd Floor Left
Portsmouth, NH 03801
[Telephone] 603.427.2821
[Facsimile] 603.427.0938
[Mobile] 603.828.2400
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:17 PM Derek Drew <derekdrew@derekmail.com> wrote:
> I entered some search queries into ChatGPT 3.5 https://chat.openai.com/
> about sophisticated Vanagon technical matters and most of the answers that
> came back were wrong and kind of stupid.
>
> Then, I entered the same questions into Google's Bard AI Engine at
> https://bard.google.com/ and most of the answers were generally correct,
> and much more sophisticated from an engineering point of view.
>
> I have not entered the same questions into ChatGPT 4 though, and
> reportedly, ChatGPT 4 Turbo will shortly be available for free via Bing
> Chat. ChatGPT 4 Turbo is very interesting because it is possible to custom
> train it. I would train it by feeding it all the emails related to Vanagon
> from 1994 and also tell it to read all of thesamba.com's Vanagon section.
> There are another 30 major Vanagon discussion areas online that I know of
> that could feed it data.
>
> Anyway, for the moment, it looks like bard is king based on me spending 20
> minutes testing both engines.
>
>
> ____________________________
> *Derek Drew*
> Sharon CT
> derekdrew@derekmail.com
> Email is best normally but...
> Mobile: 703-408-1532 (voice and texts)
>