| Subject: | Google AI Superior For Vanagon Questions |
| From: | Derek Drew <derekdrew@DEREKMAIL.COM> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:17:12 -0500 |
<html>
<body>
I entered some search queries into ChatGPT 3.5
<a href="https://chat.openai.com/" eudora="autourl">
https://chat.openai.com/</a> about sophisticated Vanagon technical
matters and most of the answers that came back were wrong and kind of
stupid.<br><br>
Then, I entered the same questions into Google's Bard AI Engine at
<a href="https://bard.google.com/" eudora="autourl">
https://bard.google.com/</a> and most of the answers were generally
correct, and much more sophisticated from an engineering point of view.
<br><br>
I have not entered the same questions into ChatGPT 4 though, and
reportedly, ChatGPT 4 Turbo will shortly be available for free via Bing
Chat. ChatGPT 4 Turbo is very interesting because it is possible to
custom train it. I would train it by feeding it all the emails related to
Vanagon from 1994 and also tell it to read all of thesamba.com's Vanagon
section. There are another 30 major Vanagon discussion areas online that
I know of that could feed it data. <br><br>
Anyway, for the moment, it looks like bard is king based on me spending
20 minutes testing both engines. <br><br>
<br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
____________________________<br>
<b>Derek
Drew</b>
<br>
Sharon CT<br>
derekdrew@derekmail.com<br>
Email is best normally but...<br>
Mobile: 703-408-1532 (voice and texts) </body>
</html>
