

| Subject: | Re: Engine woes - what to do? Cars with more possiblities! |
| From: | Todd Last |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 06:20:07 -0800 |
Yes, but note the resale value for a Jag with a chevy engine. The whole reason for having a Jag or a Mercedes is the engine. Removing that, kills the resale value. Todd On 12/25/2013 11:52 AM, Scott Daniel wrote: > for example the popular Chevy V-8 in the Jaguar XJ6 > Possibly hundreds of those have been done. Possibly more than that even. > Very likely there are kits for that conversion. > > I've seen a Mercedes sedan ..the popular 300D body style from about > 1984, with a .. > A carbureted Chev V-8 and chevy auto trans dropped into. They guy > nagged me to buy it even ..for $ 2,000 or so, well less than what he > had into it. Had a large goofy wing on the trunk too. If I didn't > already own 20 vehicles ........... > > > I believe the 'small block' chevy V-8 engine, first introduced in 1955 > with 265 cubic inches displacement.. > and with variations and other versions with larger displacements, was > produced into 2000's and may still yet be in production.. > > I think no basic engine design on earth has had so many examples > produced.. > in the 10's of millions of them. > And that engine is generally the most common hot rod or conversion > engine ever, certainly in North America, > and around the world, GM of Australia for example. I'm sure they know > that engine well ther. > > Merry ! > Scott > > > > On 12/25/2013 11:40 AM, Dennis Haynes wrote: >> Yes! Any car with a conventional front engine driving the rear wheels >> via >> drive shaft and solid rear axle. On all of these use most any >> engine-transmission assembly your wish and even change the rear axle! >> >> Dennis >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On >> Behalf Of >> Jim Felder >> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:08 PM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: Re: Engine woes - what to do? >> >> Does anyone know of a car that has more engine swap possibilities than a >> Vanagon? >> >> Jim >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Jack R <jack007@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> I know a couple volks who are very pleased with their Bostig >>> conversion. >>> http://www.bostig.com/ >>> >>> In my case, I came very close to putting in a 2.5l 5 cly TDI (owned >>> the motor, and was ready to proceed), but the cost to beef up the >>> trans due to the torque of a diesel among many other things, resulted >>> in converting my >>> 84 >>> Wolfie to a 2.1L out of a 91 in tip top shape. Very pleased in all. >>> As I use my Westie for a few weekends of Michigan Camping, and put >>> about 5,000 miles on it a year, the ROI from the costly conversion to >>> get more MPG or performance is not there for me. >>> >>> Each conversion is a unique decision, and Scott makes some valid >>> points on your current situation. >>> >>> Good luck with whatever you do... I'll speak for everyone on this >>> list, we ALL hate to see any Vanagon leave circulation!! >>> >>> Jack R. >>> 84 Westy Wolfie with a 2.1L (owned since 87, and restored to original >>> splendor) >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On >>> Behalf Of Scott Daniel >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:14 AM >>> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >>> Subject: Re: Engine woes - what to do? >>> >>> I'll have to second this. Inline 4 gasser didn't pop into my mind as a >>> solution out of the poster's current delema .. >>> but yeah .. >>> simple , cheap, durable, easily repalced, all VW , good fuel economy, >>> decent power .. >>> there is a lot to like in a VW-based I4 gasser conversion. >>> >>> ...if I ever find time to my to play with my 3 actually.... ..mutter >>> mutter. >>> >>> >>> On 12/23/2013 4:07 PM, Don Hanson wrote: >>>> I'll chime in for the inline VW swap as probably the simplest and most >>>> economical way to go. Like Jim, I really like the power, the fuel >>>> economy and the overall simplicity of having a VW motor on VW parts in >>>> my VW van. I did keep the Digifant 1.8 liter head and all the wires >>>> do plug right in, pretty much. It bolts right in using VW diesel >>>> parts that are available and proven...the diesel VW engine is the >>>> same block as the gasser, so all the parts for mounting it are factory >>>> stock. ABA blocks are also identical. My motor cost me about $600 >>>> to build from a $300 Jetta ABA and I sold off the extra parts to >>>> almost make a profit. >>>> You can find almost unlimited inline VW motors for under $500 >>>> all over everywhere. The only downside is there is no one source of >>>> information on this particular swap, not that it needs a lot of >>>> explaining. Inline parts are dirt cheap, they are simple to work on >>>> and quite robust. I was a VW rookie when I got mine already >>>> converted, but the fellow who did the conversion was a carpenter and >>>> not a mechanic. I've since done a lot of swapping around and >>>> messing with it, mainly to learn and because they are so cheap and >>>> simple....They are easy to mess with....I never HAD to work on mine >>>> much, but I chose to go to the ABA 2.0 liter block after reading >>>> about it and finding one for $300...Took me 2 days, about to swap all >> the >>>> stuff over and re-install it into my van. I have a spare motor now, >>>> too...should I ever need one. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Todd Last <rubatoguy@comcast.net> >>> wrote: >>>>> After almost 230,00 miles my '88 Vanagon is displaying symptoms of >>>>> a >>> head >>> leak - I have not yet confirmed this or done a recent compression >>> test, but plan to do so. I have concluded that one of the worst >>> things you can do to your van is not use it. Bad things happen when >>> they >> are left sitting! >>>>> In any case I am looking at my options, and started out thinking >>>>> about >>> replacing the heads, then thought if I was going to do that, I might >>> as well put in new piston rings too, and well, once you do that you >>> might as well go a step farther and do an engine rebuild. Of course, >>> once you get there, the question becomes, stock, modified (like >>> GoWesty) or engine swap. In looking at these options, it looks like a >>> cost of $5,000 or more. From what I have seen, Subaru conversions can >>> reach over $10K. Yikes! >>>>> I was wondering if I could get opinions on the best course of >>>>> action in >>> this situation, not wanting to spend tens of thousands of dollars. >>> Would list memebers give me their 2 cents worth and if possible, what >>> the aproximate costs for the various solutions range from? I'm not >>> sure if it makes more sence to just install new heads and hope for the >>> best, or go full bore and swap the engine. >>>>> What does the voice of experience say? Anyone out there have >>>>> opinions on >>> the GoWesty performance engines vs. a Subaru transplant? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Todd >>>>> '88 Westy >>>>> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »