

| Subject: | Re: '84 value? |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:06:25 -0800 |
Somebody's got to go first Neil and it mi9ght as well be you. :) We'll help. On Nov 28, 2007 8:31 PM, neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > True. I had the Wiki in mind. > > I guess I could start an article. > > The trick is to get other listers over there to put their .02 in! --- ;^) > > > > > On 11/28/07, Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > You could consolidate all this and add it to the Vanagon Wiki. :) > > > > On Nov 28, 2007 8:11 PM, neil N < musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So this begs the question. > > > Is there a data base somewhere listing the minute differences between > > > the > > > various years? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/28/07, Mike Collum <collum@verizon.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Just to show that things changed during the model year of '85, My > > > '85 > > > > Westy has the "Old style" emergency brake handle and ratchet, metal > > > > coolant pipes (not plastic), but cast lower control arms and the > > > single > > > > throttle position switch. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dennis Haynes wrote: > > > > > 85 got the larger diameter coolant hoses and plastic pipes. Most > > > have > > > > > power steering and a Tach. Many will have the cast front lower > > > control > > > > > arms. > > > > > > > > > > The 2.1 is different in many ways including better front brakes. > > > > > > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > > > Behalf > > > > Of > > > > > John Reynolds > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:01 PM > > > > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > > > Subject: Re: '84 value? > > > > > > > > > > " The next year, 85 is considerably better, and 86 to 91's much > > > better > > > > > yet. " > > > > > > > > > > Can Scott or someone else explain how an 85 is considerably better > > > than > > > > an > > > > > 84, and why an 86, besides having a 2.1, is even better. I'm > > > curious. > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that if you are going to do an engine conversion, > > > then > > > > > perhaps picking up one of these 84's is the way to go - no? > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > 87 VW WWW or VW W^3 or is that V(W)^4 ? (Wolfsburg Wesfalia > > > Weekender) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - > > > "Jaco" (Bustorius) http://web.mac.com/tubaneil > > > > > > Engine swap beginings: http://musomuso.googlepages.com/home > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jake > > 1984 Vanagon GL > > 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" > > Crescent Beach, BC > > www.crescentbeachguitar.com > > http://subyjake.googlepages.com/ > > > > > > -- > Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - > "Jaco" (Bustorius) http://web.mac.com/tubaneil > > Engine swap beginings: http://musomuso.googlepages.com/home > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" Crescent Beach, BC www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »