

| Subject: | 102mph - Turbo vs. 6-cylinder |
| From: | Sudhir Desai |
| Date: | Tue, 22 May 2007 14:39:05 -0400 |
Not to resurrect this topic, but I found a link of value. http://www.ecutune.com/svx-stage3.htm for all of you who like the idea of more power :D Sudhir On 5/18/07, John Reddick <SVYOLO@yahoo.com> wrote: > I have nothing against supercharging anthing, turbo or mechanically. > There is a large aftermarket to get any amount of power you want out of a > lot of engines, including Subaru's. The cost of putting a turbo Subie in > is an extra 1000-1500 in engine cost, plus a bunch more labor. We would > love to do them, but we when quote a price nobody buys one. Same with a > TDI, although a WRX motor install is still a couple grand cheaper than a > TDI. > Most of the Subaru turbos available are WRX's. 2 liters and not much > low end torque. The newer 2.5 turbos are extremely rare and expensive on > the used market. > Most of the van owners that want big power and are willing to pay the > money for it are Syncro Westy/Sycnro owners. The turbo Subaru motors > don't fit real well with the Syncro gas tank. > That brings up the 6 cylinders. The SVX's are plentiful and not that > expensive on the used market. They are more labor intensive to install, > but the end result is awesome. > The newer H6 3.0's are just now getting plentiful and cheap enough to > be affordable for Vanagons. 212 hp and good low end torque also. They > are only slightly larger than the 4 cylinder Subaru's, and the fit should > be a bit easier in the Vanagon. > > John >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »