>Hi, Andrew!
>
>Here is the first view; I don't seem to be able to send both views
>on the same e-mail, evem though I've followed instructions; and if I
>put them both in a folder, nobody can seem to open it.
>
>Here goes,
>Linda
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Your files are attached and ready to send with this message.
>
>Attachment converted: 36 GB:Suspect Bivalve 001 (2).jpg (JPEG/ogle) (00044C9F)

Hi Linda

Those sure look like lepadomorph scuta to me. I was fooled by a
Recent one too... had it cataloged as an aplysiomorph (seahare)
gastropod for a few years... Bruce Marshall spotted my mistake.

If you look closely you will see that there is not a bivalve hinge
structure; if held under a strong low-angle elgih, the muscle scars
will be nonmolluscan also.

I attach an image of my fossil specimen (cc to list will strip it);
it is an unusually strongly-sculptured form. Measures about 30mm, so
it's a huge gooseneck, too. I will have John Buckeridge, a barnacle
specialist, examine it when he's down in Dunedin for the Geological
Society Conference in November. And if I'm right, it will be
recataloged in the Geology Dept collection!
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut
_________________________
I want your sinistral gastropods!
_________________________
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?