After reading Phaedra's post I ventured over and checked them out.   Was told they are made by michelin,
and each had a load rating (class C) of 1432 lb/tire (X4 = 5728).  These tires have the same load rating
as the Michelin LTX.  The Michelin Agilis 61 (what Michelin offers for the Vanagon) has a load rating
(class C) of 1750 lb/tire.  Checking the door jam of my syncro, the GVW is 5512, with a distribution
of 2866 front and 3042 rear.  So in the rear on my van these tires would be a little light.
Check your van Phaedra to see how these numbers jive.

I'm a little puzzed since the Kirkland is a 6 ply, and the Agilis is a 4 ply with reinforcing.
Not sure if the 93/90 appearing on the tire is Load Index or not.

John

=========================================
Dave and Phaedra wrote:

Date:    Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:32:53 -0700
From:    PSavage <psavage@saber.net>
Subject: Re: Re  Kirkland tires

Can this be true!
Anybody else have an opinion on this load rating?
If they ARE the deathtrap Dave claims, I want to
know about it & change the tires--
Phaedra

>From Dave M:  < If 93/90 is the load index, there is
no way these tires are suitable for a Vanagon.
It requires a load index more like 96 or 97.
You are dicing with death! >

<snip>Kirkland Signature
radial light truck tires
Load Range C
LT 195/75R14
93/90  Q  M&S

Eighteen months ago, I paid $50 apiece at Costco.
I love these tires!
Phaedra <snip>

------------------------------